New Delhi, A Delhi court docket has framed fees towards a person for allegedly trafficking and raping a minor after discovering a “prima facie” case.
Extra periods choose Susheel Bala Dagar additionally framed fees towards a girl for exploiting a toddler worker, discharged one other accused mentioning the shortage of adequate proof.
The case was towards one Firoz alias Mohammad Jumrat, Renu Tora and Deepak Jain.
The court docket’s verdict on December 23, 2024, stated a few years earlier than the FIR was registered on January 29, 2022, accused Firoz induced and recruited the survivor for family chores in numerous properties and sexually assaulted her and even paid her to realize consent.
“He dedicated penetrative sexual assault…,” the court docket stated.
Firoz and his confederate Tora withheld the minor’s earnings, which they acquired from her employer Jain, it stated.
Expenses below IPC Sections 370 , 370 A , 376 2 , 376 , 174 A have been framed towards Firoz.
The court docket additionally framed fees towards him below Part 6 of the Safety of Youngsters from Sexual Offences Act and below Part 79 below the JJ Act.
“Prima facie cost below Part 79 of the JJ Act is made out towards the accused Renu Tora. Expenses framed below the stated sections have been learn over to the accused Firoz and Renu Tora, who after understanding the identical have pleaded not responsible and claimed trial,” it held additional.
Jain, the court docket noticed, was not accused of rape by the survivor in her assertion earlier than the Justice of the Peace.
“The fabric positioned on document doesn’t make out any offence, even prima facie to border a cost towards the accused Deepak Jain,” the court docket stated.
In line with the FIR, the minor was taken by a relative from a Jharkhand village to Ranchi from the place Firoz introduced her to Delhi.
This text was generated from an automatic information company feed with out modifications to textual content.
