Delhi HC refuses to entertain PIL to determine ‘Sanatan Dharm Raksha Board’ | Newest Information India

Must read

Suhasini Haidar
Suhasini Haidar
Suhasini Haidar is a prominent Indian journalist known for her expertise in national and international affairs. She serves as the National and Foreign Affairs Editor, focusing on geopolitical issues and India's foreign policy. With a strong background in political reporting, she has gained recognition for her insightful analysis and ability to explain complex topics to a broad audience. Suhasini is also an active participant in discussions on current affairs, making her a respected voice in journalism.
- Advertisement -

Nov 27, 2024 01:22 PM IST

The Delhi Excessive Courtroom on Wednesday refused to entertain a PIL in search of the structure of a ‘Sanatan Dharm Raksha Board’.

- Advertisement -

A bench headed by Chief Justice Manmohan noticed that it can not situation a path to the authorities to represent such a board as the difficulty fell inside coverage area and requested the petitioner to strategy the federal government as a substitute.

Additionally Learn: Delhi HC tells DJB to pay 22L for boy’s dying in 2016

- Advertisement -

“It’s a must to go to the federal government. We do not do that. They (MPs) will elevate it in Parliament. We won’t do something on this. We won’t say create a belief,” the bench, additionally comprising Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, mentioned.

Additionally Learn: Delhi govt spending solely on freebies, not infrastructure: HC

The counsel for the petitioner ‘Sanatan Hindu Sewa Sangh Belief’ argued that the board was wanted to guard the ‘sanatan dharm’ whose followers had been allegedly being attacked by followers of different religions.

- Advertisement -

Additionally Learn: Allahabad HC asks Centre to determine on plea over Rahul Gandhi’s citizenship by December 19: Report

He mentioned related boards had been current for different religions however he was but to obtain any response from the Centre on his illustration.

The courtroom noticed that it didn’t have the data or functionality to go the path sought by the petitioner.

“Writ petition is closed after giving liberty to the petitioner to strategy the federal government,” the courtroom mentioned.

Get Present Updates on…

See extra

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

More articles

Latest article

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img