KTR accuses Telangana’s Cong govt of misusing powers in awarding contracts | Newest Information India

Must read

Suhasini Haidar
Suhasini Haidar
Suhasini Haidar is a prominent Indian journalist known for her expertise in national and international affairs. She serves as the National and Foreign Affairs Editor, focusing on geopolitical issues and India's foreign policy. With a strong background in political reporting, she has gained recognition for her insightful analysis and ability to explain complex topics to a broad audience. Suhasini is also an active participant in discussions on current affairs, making her a respected voice in journalism.
- Advertisement -

Opposition Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) chief KT Rama Rao on Tuesday accused Telangana’s Congress authorities of blatantly misusing powers in awarding contracts value 8,888 crore below the AMRUT 2.0 water provide scheme and sought their cancellation alleging “corruption and crony capitalism.”

Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader KT Rama Rao at a press conference in New Delhi. (X)
Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) chief KT Rama Rao at a press convention in New Delhi. (X)

- Advertisement -

“There can’t be a much bigger instance of crony capitalism, corruption, and abuse of energy,” Rao stated in New Delhi after main a BRS delegation that met with Union minister Manohar Lal Khattar on Monday to induce cancellation of “unlawful AMRUT 2.0 contracts” in Telangana.

He accused the Telangana authorities of facilitating corruption to profit its leaders. Rao cited Congress chief Rahul Gandhi’s criticism of corruption and crony capitalism and questioned how highly effective individuals near the federal government had been exploiting their connections to amass wealth.

Rao, who’s popularly often known as KTR, referred to tenders issued in February value 1,137 crore to a three way partnership of Indian Hume Pipe Firm (IHP), Sodha Constructions, and AMR. He stated IHP, a listed firm, introduced it could solely execute 20% of the undertaking, leaving 80% to Sodha Constructions, a agency allegedly linked to chief minister Revanth Reddy’s brother-in-law, Sujan Reddy.

- Advertisement -

Rao questioned the flexibility of Sodha Constructions, which recorded modest web earnings of 3.5 crore in 2020-21 and 2021-22, to deal with such large-scale initiatives. “Sodha Constructions… lacks the credentials to deal with such massive initiatives, elevating critical questions concerning the tendering course of,” he stated.

Rao accused Revanth Reddy of utilizing his affect because the municipal administration minister to award the contracts. He added this amounted to violations of the Structure’s Article 191 (1) associated to the workplace of revenue, the Illustration of the Individuals Act, and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Rao focused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and questioned why no motion was taken in opposition to Revanth Reddy regardless of allegations. He added they agree with Modi when he says Telangana has develop into an ATM for Congress. Rao stated they’ve given proof however what was the Union authorities doing. “PM [Prime Minister] stated throughout Parliament elections that RR Tax was being taken. Why are they not taking motion?”

- Advertisement -

He known as this a litmus check for the Bharatiya Janata Occasion. “If you happen to give work to households of ministers… is that this not an workplace of revenue and battle of curiosity?” Rao requested.

In his illustration to Khattar on Monday, Rao likened the contract allocations to the alleged rip-off in Congress-ruled Karnataka associated to the allocation of compensatory websites to chief minister Siddaramaiah’s spouse in Mysuru, which had increased property worth as in comparison with the situation of her land.

He stated the AMRUT 2.0 case was just like the Haryana authorities’s alleged misuse of the legislation to profit Congress chief Sonia Gandhi’s son-in-law, Robert Vadra, in 2013.

Rao identified that the Structure mandates a separation between public duties and enterprise pursuits. “Awarding the AMRUT contracts to his [chief minister]’s brother-in-law amounted to a battle of curiosity,” he stated. He added the tender course of violated the code of conduct prohibiting public representatives and their households from collaborating in companies offering items or companies to the federal government. “If the chief minister and his household are immediately concerned in corrupt practices, who will blow the whistle?” requested Rao. He known as for an intensive probe into the AMRUT 2.0 contracts, citing considerations that the technical and monetary {qualifications} required for them had been missed within the case of Sodha Constructions.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

More articles

Latest article

spot_imgspot_imgspot_imgspot_img