The Supreme Court docket on Thursday expressed concern over the “collapsed” system of submitting and itemizing circumstances on the Allahabad excessive court docket whereas listening to a plea by Uttar Pradesh legislator Abbas Ansari relating to disputed land in Lucknow.
The court docket, which described work on the HC as “worrisome”, made the observations after studying that Ansari’s petition looking for a keep on development on his plot, which the state claims is “evacuee” land, had not been heard even as soon as regardless of the highest court docket’s October 2024 directive for an “out of flip” listening to.
Additionally Learn: Allahabad HC orders encroachment elimination, pressing repairs at Chhota Imambara entry gates
“This is among the excessive courts that we’re worrisome about,” mentioned a bench headed by justice Surya Kant, ordering establishment on the disputed land till the excessive court docket takes up the matter.
The court docket was knowledgeable that since its October 21 order requesting the Allahabad HC to listen to the matter expeditiously by November 4, the case was listed eight instances with none listening to.
Additionally Learn: SC refuses to entertain plea looking for exclusions from SC, ST quotas in MP
“We don’t need to remark something however submitting has collapsed, itemizing has collapsed. No one is aware of when a matter will come up for listening to,” the bench, additionally comprising justice N Kotiswar Singh, mentioned. Justice Kant talked about he had lately met with judges and registrars of the excessive court docket to debate these points.
The matter positive aspects significance in mild of current controversies surrounding the Allahabad HC. One among its judges, justice Shekhar Kumar Yadav, attended a Vishwa Hindu Parishad occasion in Prayagraj on December 8 and made remarks focusing on the Muslim neighborhood. He supported abolition of triple talaq and halala beneath the Uniform Civil Code and advocated for the nation to be dominated by the bulk beneath a Hindu ruler.
Additionally Learn: Allahabad HC dismisses PIL towards Justice Shekhar Yadav’s impeachment movement
The Supreme Court docket Collegium, together with Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and 4 senior judges together with justice Kant, summoned Yadav final month, warning him about public utterances and requesting a report from the excessive court docket chief justice.
Yadav’s feedback led to an impeachment movement by 55 Rajya Sabha members.
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who represented Ansari and led the Rajya Sabha delegation looking for justice Yadav’s elimination, advised the court docket, “That is the biggest excessive court docket the place it’s occurring.” He added that since October 21, the matter was listed eight instances earlier than justices Ranjan Roy and Brij Raj Singh with none efficient listening to.
Abbas, son of late gangster-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari who died in custody at Banda jail in March 2024, gained the Mau meeting seat in 2022, beforehand held by his father for 5 phrases. Whereas authorities attributed Mukhtar’s dying to a coronary heart assault, his household alleged “sluggish poisoning.”
The disputed plot (No. 93) was bought by Abbas’s grandfather via a registered sale deed in 2004 and subsequently transferred to Abbas and his brother via inheritance. In August 2020, the sub-divisional Justice of the Peace of Dalilagh, Lucknow declared it evacuee property in an ex parte order, prompting affected events together with Abbas to method the excessive court docket.
The Supreme Court docket, whereas avoiding direct observations concerning the excessive court docket’s dealing with of the case, ordered upkeep of establishment, citing potential “irreparable loss” if third-party rights had been created on the land the place the state authorities had begun development beneath the PM Awas Yojna.
The bench directed its order to be communicated to the excessive court docket for earliest potential listening to, reiterating its October 21 directive which had requested the excessive court docket to “take up the appliance out of flip, in that case required, in order that the prayer of the petitioner for interim safety may be appropriately adjudicated.”
